.
Feedback

Pa. Lottery Privatization Rejected by Attorney General

Pennsylvania’s newest attorney general Kathleen Kane said the administration’s contract to privatize management of the Pennsylvania Lottery is unconstitutional and not statutorily authorized.

By Melissa Daniels | PA Independent

HARRISBURG — Pennsylvania’s Attorney General Kathleen Kane rejected the governor’s contract with Camelot Global Services to manage the Pennsylvania Lottery.

Kane said the contract “contravenes the Pennsylvania Constitution and is not statutorily authorized.”

Related Op-Ed: A Bad Gamble: Pa. Lottery Privatization

Gov. Tom Corbett’s administration entered the contract — a professional management agreement — with Camelot in January. The Office of the Attorney General is required by state law to review contracts for “form and legality.”

In this case, the Camelot PMA failed to meet that test, according to a letter from Kane’s office to the administration sent early Thursday.

State officials in the Department of Revenue said, upon entering the Camelot agreement, it would bring in more money than the lottery makes as a state-run entity. Profits fund programs for senior citizens, like prescription drug and at-home assistance costs.

But throughout the procurement process, lawmakers from both parties, unionized workers at the PA Lottery and State Treasurer Rob McCord publicly wondered if the contract was legal, if the procurement process was fair, or if it overstepped the rights of lawmakers to authorize an expansion of gaming.

The rejection means that the state won’t see additional revenue from the state lottery that was projected.

Corbett’s budget officials have said the Camelot contract would bring an additional $50 million to senior citizen programs’ in the 2013-2014 budget, which was proposed on Feb. 5.

Corbett said in a statement that he was “deeply disappointed.”

“I don’t agree with the attorney general’s analysis and decision, and we will review our legal options,” he said. “My job is to protect Pennsylvania’s seniors, and we will continue to do that.”

Kane, who won the office by a landslide in November, is the first Democrat and first woman elected to the Attorney General seat. This announcement marks her first major decision in the office.

In her announcement, Kane said that the PMA failed the form and legality test on three main points. First and foremost, Kane said the executive branch, namely the secretary of revenue, overstepped legal boundaries.

“The PMA is an unlawful extension of executive authority that infringes on the General Assembly’s powers to make basic policy choices regarding the management and operation of the lottery,” as described in the state constitution, Kane said.

Kane said parts of the proposal adding electronic and monitor-based games like Keno to the state lottery system are not authorized by the State Lottery Act. That’s because the expansion “usurps the authority” of the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board, Kane said.

Lastly, the contract allows Camelot to be compensated for “indirect expenses.” This “open and undefined indemnification” is unconstitutional, she said.

Kane did not take questions from reporters after she made the announcement.

Democrats have denounced the Corbett administration’s move to privatize the state lottery, but Kane said her decision was based solely on the legality of the contract.

And she said she wanted to warn the public against politician’s who may point the finger at her office from taking money from seniors.

“It is disingenuous to put the cart before the horse by promising money to people in need based upon a contract before making sure that that contract is legal and then blaming the messenger when it is deemed illegal,” Kane said.

Kane said the office reviews as many as 5,000 contracts a year.

“While most are approved, we do not rubber stamp any one of them,” Kane said.

Contact Melissa Daniels melissa@paindependent.com

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Salisbury Patch? Find your Local Patch »

atthebeach February 20, 2013 at 01:53 am
The thing that bothered me about privatization is that the company is from England. Why couldn't they find a PA company or at least a US company. Glad our AG is following the constitution as her job demands.
Rich Cranium February 20, 2013 at 03:43 pm
Like when she changed the law regarding a reciprocity agreement for concealed carry with another state which is outside of the boundaries of her office?
Wallst February 20, 2013 at 07:33 pm
It took a Democratic woman to be elected to AG in PA to get things done right.
Wallst February 21, 2013 at 02:45 pm
Phillyboy, NOW you care about deaths? And FOUR?!?!?!? Your head must have EXPLODED during the Iraq war, no?? Oh, of course not, THAT war was GW's! Don't even go there with me, you neo-con idiot! And Socialist President? You don't even know what the word means!
Nazaretti February 21, 2013 at 03:00 pm
Two of the Benghazi casualties were diplomats, the other two were CIA security men.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
jennifer February 13, 2013 at 02:11 pm
This is an awesome business idea! Thank you so much for the article, I never heard of this and willRead More definitely try their service!
Anjanette February 13, 2013 at 03:27 pm
Hi, Jennifer. Glad to hear that you'll be giving Pure Sprouts a try! Here's a coupon code for 15%Read More off your first order to get you started! :) PS2013AB
My TwoCents May 25, 2013 at 08:43 pm
Everybody says "legalize it and tax it." That's just an oxymoron = once it is legal = youRead More can grow it in your back yard for free. Big Brother makes so much more already by enforcing the established laws, set up with the sole desire to incarcerate the addicted, that there will always be a fictional "War on Drugs."
Christopher Morton May 30, 2013 at 03:57 pm
Yes, and the person next to you drinking cannabis tea, does not effect you. The person who justRead More vaporized, does not effect you. Those hash oil tablets I just ate, won't effect you. Non-smoking means non-smoking - if there is someone smoking next to you, get out of the smoking section. You are right, marijuana is not like alcohol. If I were sitting next to you while I was high, and you annoyed the piss out of me by complaining about smokers in place that obviously allows smoking, I would just laugh it off or move away. I could smoke all night, and my mood would not change. If I were to drink, and keep drinking, eventually I would get confrontational, and we would be fighting. So, the guy next to you drinking can indeed effect you.
Slick Rick June 10, 2013 at 01:31 pm
You fail to realize that making somthing illegal instantly makes that product very expensive on theRead More black market.......this is where crime takes hold.......Remember Al Capone and the mafia were most powerful during the prohibition of alcohol......and considering Pennsylvania garners high tax revenue from alcohol sales in state stores.....your suggestion is foolish...........This is AMERICA land of the FREE.......dont tell people how to live you dirty commie
WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr. May 20, 2013 at 12:42 pm
Economics is over my head...I won't even attempt to analyze it, let alone debate on it...All I knowRead More is I make sure there is food on the table through prudent budgeting. I do want to express my excitement when the Phillies win games...Yesterday was majorly exciting with Galvis hitting that walk off home run following Kratz's whopper to tie the game!..But must the team have to wait for the last inning to do it?..Keep it up, Phillies.
Rosemary B May 20, 2013 at 12:44 pm
Tea Party groups are all very separate with separate missions. I understand the ones targeted wereRead More seeking the tax free charitable status because their stated mission is to educate about issues. They are not an actual "political" party. They will usually look favorably upon any candidate for lower taxes and smaller government.At least that is my understanding.
Rich Cranium May 20, 2013 at 01:33 pm
Kilgore what you are saying is the equivalent of saying that women who dress provocatively inviteRead More sexual harassment or rape.
WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 06:42 pm
to bill burr...Of course, I don't expect you to buy it...What red-blooded Republican-leaningRead More Independent want to heatr the truth?..Who is know to be hostage taker?..Guess...Who filibusters?..Who obstructs? Benghazi?..No smoking gun there...Sorry.
Rosemary B May 13, 2013 at 07:18 pm
Not sure which scandal will be this administrations undoing, Benghazi or the IRS targetingRead More conservative groups. And it is still so early in his second term...
Rosemary B May 16, 2013 at 01:21 pm
Reality check. Interesting information from a RECENT study.Read More http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2013/05/14/disarming-realities-as-gun-sales-soar-gun-crimes-plummet/